The in-class essay practice has helped me understand where everything should go and how they should connect in the AP English format. I questioned the topic sentences before, but now have a better grasp on their purpose; they are both stepping stones to the thesis and sub-arguments leading to the thesis stated at the beginning. The essay does nothing more than provide evidence and logic to support the thesis; it does not further its claims.
Reading about syntax was interesting, but it seemed like the majority of examples focused on "form follows function," making me wonder if the packet was trying to make a point, or if the technique really is that common.
It was nice having comedic terms laid out, but most of it, as well as the purpose of comedy, were review. After reading Beckett's Endgame last year, The American Dream seemed, though complex, accessible. Still, it was difficult to write about after one reading and a limited discussion. Not being able to draw out quotes did not help me, either.
The small lesson on plagiarism was surprising and intimidating. Common knowledge not depending on the context and audience struck me as odd. I hadn't thought of being so careful in homages, either. Still, the buffer that academic students have was comforting to hear of.
I never thought about the essay as "not furthering the thesis's claim." Thanks! That helped me a lot!
ReplyDeleteBasing off of what Holmes said about syntax, the majority of the examples are "form follows function." However, some people study the techniques like a bible and attempt to use syntax that would serve the purpose they want. Some, though, are just gifted and naturally use the appropriate syntax.
Yeah, I agree. I know we have to quote literature to do well on the AP exam but...so far, I can't come up with an American Dream quote right off the top of my head.
I'm not sure the topic sentences are stepping stones to the thesis which comes before them, but they definitely help to elaborate on it. However I agree with what you say about the essays using logic and evidence to support as opposed to furthering its claims. I think what you said about syntax is interesting. I don't think authors are consciously aware of using an established form of syntax, I think it just happens, and therefore it becomes common.
ReplyDeleteThat's an interesting way of thinking about the topic sentences, something I too have struggle to grasp the exact purpose of. I also think that packet was helpful to an extent, but I too questioned it's purpose, I feel that identifying syntax is one thing but I still feel are specific styles that I'm still not sure with how they lead to the meaning.
ReplyDelete